Ederlyn vs. Inday Round 1
Sep 28th, 2007 by admin
Ederlyn: Walang hiya ka! Wala kang karapatang pantayan ako! Hayop ka! You’re nothing but a second rate, trying hard, copycat!
Inday: Excuse moi? Me, a copycat?! Your mockery is so lame and your attempt at English is so predictable! Why don’t you open your eyes to the fact that your glory days are over?! Your persistence to persuade people to come to a party that does not exist is simply ridiculous and cheaply constructed! It’s beginning to get to my nerves! You and your petty schemes! No one undermines my intellect, you low life bitch!
Popularity: 9% [?]


October 18th, 2007 at 6:35 am
…that does not exists is simply ridiculous…
“exist” lang po, alang “s”…
sana kasalanan lang to ni manager ni inday, at di talaga si inday
October 21st, 2007 at 10:40 am
di kaya sa sobrang galit niya nagka-typo sha? i love inday! hehe.
October 29th, 2007 at 4:53 pm
tindi mo!!! wooh! \m/
mali yan sa pag type. di ni inday.
diba inday?
November 5th, 2007 at 4:52 pm
dapat nga may S talaga yung exist eh
November 19th, 2007 at 10:46 am
actually kailangan may “s” kasi she uses does,so as for Grammar law, does needs to be connected with the base form of the verb..naks!
astig mo inday!
idooool.
November 21st, 2007 at 9:30 am
Tama naman ung grammar ah… kapag, do, did, does, dapat base form lang ang gagamitin na verb… like what did you DO?
why does he EXIST… How do you DO….
ganun un….
November 21st, 2007 at 9:33 am
dapat walang “S”… kapag mga “DO” verb, laging base form ang gagamitin…
What did you “DO”
Why does she “EXIST”
its not typo….
November 25th, 2007 at 3:16 pm
The reason why I love Inday’s blog is that people make comments on the mistakes in the grammar or her entree…and give out corrections…
in short, intellectuals and mga tao dito… hindi lang tawa ng tawa!!!!
regards to you all!!!!
November 25th, 2007 at 3:17 pm
* of her entree
November 27th, 2007 at 3:50 pm
aha, bakit nagmumura si inday? akala ko ba sophisticated sya?
December 21st, 2007 at 3:20 pm
uhm guys..
pakibasa nyo po muna maigi ung sinabi ni Inday bago po kayo magcomment.
kasi sa totoo lang, wla naman po talagang “S” ung EXIST na sinabi nya.
at tama pong wlang “S” un.
December 28th, 2007 at 11:21 am
grammarians pala ang visitors ng blog site ni inday.
wala talagang ‘S’ yun.
April 14th, 2008 at 6:01 am
(nosebleed) grabe mga grammarians mga tao dito or linguists.
April 17th, 2008 at 3:44 pm
Astig. :]]
haha! No comment nalang ako sa with or without “s”. Haha!
June 30th, 2008 at 12:19 am
hahah…mali nmn kc ung first comment.. may “does” na, dat implies noun or an instance is singular.. pero this is funny.. its fun to read this comments hehe… san n kaya si jhunhalhynne
June 30th, 2008 at 12:22 am
typo.. the comments pala hahaha
December 25th, 2008 at 9:07 pm
buti ngayon simple english lng ang ginamit ni inday
July 26th, 2009 at 2:04 am
“Your persistence to persuade people to come to a party that does not exist is simply ridiculous…”
as to why “-s” is not added to the word exist is hopefully an obvious knowledge co-existent among speakers of English language. But for clarification purposes, this is the reason:
It is right to fully notice the magnitude of the length of the subject for this sentence first. The predicate of course, is “simple ridiculous…” Then the subject would be the “persistence to persuade people to come to a party.”
“that does not exist” will be describing what kind of party it is, as a supporting fragment. This in grammar rule, is not under number rule.
Just as “Did you ATE breakfast” is wrong (here, the word EAT is not affected, because the word DID already makes the sentence past.)
But have no shame, for everyone is subject to mistakes. Inday and people like her do not exist to boast; they exist to showcase the capability of human nature and to illustrate somehow, the limiting floor for the human credibility.
The existence and realization of someone more profound than an individual is a great stepping stone for knowledge crave, that may sometimes come as a shock or a laughter.
Good Day to all XD